Here’s some classic rock music for you while you read! This song is called Lola by the Kinks.
Andrew Wakefield’s Research
In 1998, Andrew Wakefield conducted a study aiming to study the correlation between certain vaccines and regressive developmental disorders. His study included 12 children (11 boys and 1 girl) with a mean age of six years. These subjects were described in the paper as a consecutive series, and were referred to a pediatric gastroenterology unit with histories of normal development followed by a loss of acquired skills, such as language. However, Wakefield was later found of ethical violations during the research, as he conducted investigations on the children without obtaining the necessary ethical clearances and scientific misrepresentation, as the so called consecutive sampling was selective. He was also found that the funding for this research came from lawyers who had been engaged by parents in lawsuits against vaccine-producing companies.
There was a complete lack of a control group in this study. If one had to examine if ” MMR vaccines cause regressive developmental disorders”, they have to compare vaccinated children to unvaccinated ones on a large scale and see if autism rates differed, but the study relied on a very small sample and made the link back from autism. Wakefield’s findings were not capable of being replicated by other research groups. The scientific method consists of making observations, conducting background research, forming a testable hypothesis, experimentation, data analysis, and communicating results. Wakefield’s research made the opposite link while making observations: it should have used a large sample and saw only children who had the MMR vaccine and had development disorders later.
Madsen’s Research
Madsen’s study also researches the correlation between autism and the MMR vaccine. The study included a total of 537,303 children born in Denmark between January 1991 and December 1998, with their health, developmental, and human status identified through Danish National Board of Health, Danish Psychiatric Central Register, and the Danish Civil Registration System. The controls for this study were essentially the unvaccinated children within this same population, ensuring that there were less of other variables such as social environment. Of the total cohort, 440,655 children (82.0%) had received the MMR vaccine, while the remaining 96,648 children served as the comparison group to determine if vaccination status influenced the risk of developing autism.
The study was conducted within the context of the Danish national vaccination program, which offered the MMR vaccineto children at 15 months and 12 years of age. The specific vaccine used during the study period was M-M-R II. The rationale for this retrospective study was the growing public concern and hypothesis that the MMR vaccine was a cause of autism. This concern was fueled by reports of increased in autism incidence, and specific case reports suggesting that children developed developmental regression and gastrointestinal symptoms shortly after vaccination. Current studies designed to evaluate the link between MMR vaccination and autism are not developed enough support
associations, as the evidence is weak and based on case series. Madsen provided reliable evidence to evaluate the real association.
Relative Risk Ratio
The relative risk ratio is a statistical measure used to compare the risk of a specific health outcome between two different groups. In clinical studies, it is calculated by dividing the risk of the outcome in the exposed group (such as those who received the MMR vaccine) by the risk in the unexposed group (those who did not recieve the vaccine). A relative risk of 1.0 indicates that the risk is identical in both groups, and a value greater than 1.0 suggests an increased risk associated with the exposure, while a value less than 1.0 suggests a decreased risk or no association. By calculating the relative risk ratio, Madsen would come down to how much MMR vaccines are correlated with autism . The relative risk ratio for autism in this study is 0.92, implying that there is almost no link between the MMR vaccine and autism.
In Madson’s study, their analysis yielded an adjusted relative risk of 0.92, with a 95% confidence interval ranging from 0.68 to 1.24. Because this ratio is close to 1.0 and the upper confidence interval includes 1.0, there is no statistically significant link between vaccination and autism. The study found that the risk of autism was essentially the same regardless of whether the child had been vaccinated or not. Further, the researchers observed no association between the age at vaccination or the time since vaccination and the development of autistic disorder. Ultimately, the Madsen paper follows ethical guidelines and the scientific methods, statistically proving that the MMR vaccine does not trigger autism on large scale.
.



